Anon@11:12 Yes, I love that one. I've had it for years, in a book of Leuning I was given when I was a young man. He's very good and still producing great drawings. There seems to be a problem in Australia with American drones that i wasn't aware of...
I've been trying to work out from your manner what your occupation is, Anonymous. I think I've got it - you're a fashion consultant? Am I close? Interior designer? Hair stylist? Give me another clue.
100% sure it was posted. I checked it at least twice after I posted it. The wording changed slightly and the meaning changed completely. Before you suggest I simply typed it wrong it was impossible for me post at 10.51. Literally impossible. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt and I noticed you didn't answer my question so I will ask it again. Did you change this comment Robert? Fair question I think. I hope for an honest answer.
Anonymous, whichever Anonymous you might be - you know full-well the use of 'anonymous' has created confusion on these threads. That you comment and one by 'Anonymous' has become confused has to be sheeted, I believe, to that issue. My suggestion, chose a psuedonym and stick to it. Then I'll be able to track any discrepancies and know whether the fault lay with you or with someone else. That's as fair as I can be.You could play your part, were you wanting to come out a little from behind you facade of innocence and anonymity.
Robert, I will make the question easier for you. Did you delete a comment "Am I?" and replace it with "I am". There can't be any confusion around that. Surely?
20 comments:
That guy with the occupy sign looks like Anonymous.
http://cruciality.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/leunig.jpg
Looks can be deceiving, Anonymous!
Anon@11:12
Yes, I love that one. I've had it for years, in a book of Leuning I was given when I was a young man.
He's very good and still producing great drawings. There seems to be a problem in Australia with American drones that i wasn't aware of...
Perhaps you could print off a copy of the pedestal Leunig and hang it around your neck.
Can you explain your interpretation of this comment please Anonymous?
:-)
Sure. I think it would look pretty on you.
I've been trying to work out from your manner what your occupation is, Anonymous. I think I've got it - you're a fashion consultant? Am I close? Interior designer? Hair stylist?
Give me another clue.
My guess, given Anon's eye for the aesthetic, something in retail, like Mr Humphries in Are You Being Served.
)
Close Suz. Robert, fishing for information again. Do you know the occupation of Suz?
Why is my occupation important?
Suz is a private eye who does stand-up comedy.
You're a cockie.
I am.
:-)
Scandal. Somebody deleted my post and entered a new one. Did you do that Robert?
That is a scandal, Anonymous! I'll look into it. What did your comment say? Are you sure you pressed 'Publish your comment'?
100% sure it was posted. I checked it at least twice after I posted it. The wording changed slightly and the meaning changed completely. Before you suggest I simply typed it wrong it was impossible for me post at 10.51. Literally impossible. I like to give people the benefit of the doubt and I noticed you didn't answer my question so I will ask it again. Did you change this comment Robert? Fair question I think. I hope for an honest answer.
Anonymous, whichever Anonymous you might be - you know full-well the use of 'anonymous' has created confusion on these threads. That you comment and one by 'Anonymous' has become confused has to be sheeted, I believe, to that issue. My suggestion, chose a psuedonym and stick to it. Then I'll be able to track any discrepancies and know whether the fault lay with you or with someone else. That's as fair as I can be.You could play your part, were you wanting to come out a little from behind you facade of innocence and anonymity.
Fair enough Robert.
Robert,
I will make the question easier for you. Did you delete a comment "Am I?" and replace it with "I am". There can't be any confusion around that. Surely?
Post a Comment