Thursday, November 10, 2011
Backbenches in the South
I like to watch 'Backbenches'. The pub of the same name, which sits over the road from the Beehive in Wellington is the scene of an on-going candidates meeting, where MP's and prospective parliamentarians front-up to the questions and provocations of a couple of MC's and an often 'lively' audience. There's good natured barracking, cat-calling, humorous interjections and stunts of all sorts from an audience that comes to the pub to be both entertained and informed. I've always wished that Southland's candidate meetings, generally dour and sedate events, lacking in drama and colour, could be more like those meetings at the Backbencher. So at Tuesday's meeting at Riverton, I did what I could to liven-up what would otherwise have been the 'same old thing' - a polite, somewhat dull, meet the candidates event. I was not alone. There were about 12 Green supporters in the audience of around 30. We were noisy. We had placards and balloons. We had young people amongst our number. None of these things are usual for candidate meetings in the South. There's a first time for everything, they say. There have been criticisms of our approach. Those conservative members of the community who usually dominate our candidate meetings, were unprepared for our liveliness. They were clearly frustrated by our merry-making and the influence that had on the candidates. The Green and Labour candidates had a very good time of it, for a change. The usual criticisms they get from the audience were barely noticed against the positive support they received by way of cheers and applause. Eric Roy was not so lucky, being challenged again and again to address issues that he'd probably like to have avoided. The Backbencher model was something of an ill fit in conservative Riverton, but change comes eventually to the south and it arrived on Tuesday and made a splash. Even the presence of young people upset some of the older folk in the audience, who had neglected to organise any of their own. The students who came to experience their first-ever political meeting should be congratulated for their initiative and their genuine enthusiasm. They were very well behaved, dressed well and were polite to a fault. They greeted people at the door with a smile and the played with the green balloons during the half-time break, in a charming manner. Suggestions that I arranged their presence there are wrong. They came as a result of their involvement with a group called 'Greenagers' that operates at their highschool. There is much talk around the country about the apathy of our youth, especially around politics. Those young people were and are a credit to themselves. My own daughter, 17 years old and well able to make sensible choices for herself, came to the meeting also. She was the only person from that age group at the meeting. Others of that age seem disinterested in making the effort to get out of the house and attend a political meeting, but not Hollie. She went armed with a good deal of knowledge about New Zealand politics, and some very strong opinions of her own about environmental issues, especially around lignite mining and deep sea drilling for oil, about which she had delivered papers at school.
I think the 'Backbenches' style of candidates meeting brings a much needed vigour to the southern candidates meetings and expect next year, the conservative supporters will have upped their game to match. In the meantime, any criticism of the Riverton meeting smells to me like sour grapes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
Robert I don't think your daughter really came with an open mind as your influence would have been evident.
It's all good fun to liven up a meeting but remember there were people there who actually have the right to vote who wanted to listen to the discussion peacefully
Anonymous - respectfully, you are wrong. My daughter is a strong-minded, independent thinker, as are my two sons. They have always been part of the discussion in our household and are more politically aware than most, I would suggest. My influence would be 'evident' as you suggest, but you underestimate the intelligence of my children if you think they aren't able to make their own decisions and form their own opinions!
Those who came to the meeting 'wanting to listen', were disagvantaged, I agree and they'll be especially annoyed by me, as I was the noisiest, but sometimes eggs must be broken in order to make an omlette.
I back you on this Robert. I believe many do.
Your daughter's strong views seem to have rubbed off on you, Robert, especially around lignite mining and deep sea drilling for oil.
Does she lead you in Christian-baiting as well?
Robert if your daughter was truely " strong-minded, independent thinker" she would be supporting Act not becuse they are right and you might be wrong but becuase it is the nature of inderpendent children to oppose their parents
That is how the world makes progress, not by children parroting their parents behaviour
Christian-baiting, Mark11?
What on earth makes you say that? If you can give me even a single example, I'll be happy to discuss your claim.
God bless :-)
Raymond - you seem to be in favour of children going against their parents! Is that the ACT way?
No child in their right mind, would support ACT. Plus, that party is no fun.
Young people can sense boring from 100 metres :-)
@ Anonymous
Bit of a double standard don't you think?
At every other candidate meeting I have attended previously its that Nats who are throwing jibes (and not good humored ones like the Greens do).
So why is there a fuss when the Greens are vocal? Perhaps the Nats feel their monopoly on bullying is threatened -don't worry guys, it's not our style.
Bio has it right. We were noisy, but not domineering.
The girls playing with the green balloons during the break could hardly be described as bullies :-)
Globophobia may have been rife in the audience :0
I think it was the colour of the balloons, Suz, not the balloons themselves. plus the merriment. deeply disturbing.
Post a Comment