Site Meter

Monday, October 10, 2011

On the oil spill

"To knowingly invite and even encourage deep water drilling, an activity that we know is highly likely to cause problems entirely beyond our ability to resolve them, would be reckless in the extreme.  I hope that the reality of having to deal with the Rena incident will cause the government to think again about our energy future in the interests of our environmental and economic wellbeing."

The Green's David Clendon describes the lesson that should be taken from the present, unfolding oil spill off-shore from Tauranga. The Grees see it clearly, National appears completely blind.
More from David's post, and the link.

"Nobody ever wants an oil spill anywhere in the marine environment, but in terms of acccess and ability to respond,  the location and timing of this spill could have been a great deal worse.  The vessel ran aground on a reef scarcely 20km from Tauranga, one of our largest, busiest and most modern ports.  It occurred in calm weather, and was known about almost immediately. Yet we have still struggled to bring together the necessary expertise and hardware to deal quickly  with the crisis.
How much worse would the situation be if we were to allow deepwater off shore drilling, which the Energy Minister and her government are so eager to do, and an accident occurred a long way offshore in foul weather.
The American response to the Gulf of Mexico disaster involved hundreds of vessels, and many thousands of  military, civilian and volunteer personnel.  It also required a second rig to drill the relief well that ultimately enabled the stemming of the oil flow into the waters of the Gulf.
New Zealand does not and will never have that sort of capacity.  The oil companies will resist having to take responsibility to provide it.
There will always be accidents at sea that threaten our coastlines, wildlife and the livelihoods of people who rely on the marine resource.  We need to continually assess and reassess the risks of such accidents and put in place appropriate safeguards and countermeasures.
To knowingly invite and even encourage deep water drilling, an activity that we know is highly likely to cause problems entirely beyond our ability to resolve them, would be reckless in the extreme.  I hope that the reality of having to deal with the Rena incident will cause the government to think again about our energy future in the interests of our environmental and economic wellbeing."

4 comments:

Lofty said...

Yes yes Bobby, but how do you reconcile your posts re the oil spill with the greens policy of increasing reliance on coastal shipping, therefore increasing the spill / collision risk??

robertguyton said...

Good point Lofty. I'd expect an increase in coastal shipping (which I'm sure you agree is a good idea - I've heard no one gainsaying it) would come with an improvement in standards for those activity. It sounds as though this ship has been seriously in breach of best practice for coastal shipping. That's the very thing the Greens would doubtless demand. You know what we're like - very demanding. Personally, what I'd like to see are sailing ships of modern design, plying our coastal waters. All yachts spill is wind.

Lofty said...

uh huh the most unconvincing argument I have ever seen you put up.

I call bollocks on this one Bobby.

robertguyton said...

Bollocks?
Can't really address that one til I know which part or parts you find unconvincing, Lofty, but I'm happy to give it another go, remembering that I didn't write their 'coastal shipping' policy and am trying to apply my commonsense here. More ships mean more chance of groundings - yes, what would the Greens do about that? The things you'd expect, demand best practice and close oversight. This present calamity seems to have bypassed both of those. What can I say other than the Greens would ensure the issue couldn't arise. I'd expect them too, to have better procedures in place than the present Government. The response from National has been shamefully slow!