Site Meter
Showing posts with label Great South Basin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Great South Basin. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Ship of fools


Point 1: Beneath the seabed of the Great South Basin, off-shore from Otago and Southland, there is reputedly a vast store of hydrocarbons.

Point 2: The earth is presently showing worrying signs of climate instability primarily brought about, the climate scientists say, by the combustion of hydrocarbons by human beings.

Point 3: All of the hydrocarbons that are expected to be extracted from the Great South Basin will be combusted by human beings, adding to the potentially catastrophic climate instability that is already jeopardising the lives of millions of people around the globe.

Point 4: Anyone joining these dots and warning of the foolishness of drilling the Great South Basin is set to be vilified and harangued by a bevvy of foolish souls who believe that somehow, extracting the hydrocarbons in the Great South Basin is a good idea.

SOF.



Monday, September 19, 2011

Mr Pfahlert responds








When you are a big-wig in the oil industry, you've no need to answer a letter through the 'letters to the editor' column with its 250-word restriction - you can claim the whole of the EDITORIAL/OPINION block to get around it!
Mr Pfahlert, Petroleum Exploration and Production Association executive officer opened today's Southland Times opinion piece with,

"Environment Southland councillor Robert Guyton has asked what drilling companies would do in the event of a serious spill."

To his great credit, Mr Pfahlert then launches into a detailed description of a range of contingency plans he hopes would address a serious spill should it occur off the coast of Southland. He cites 'international support', the use of oil dispersants, booms and skimmers, a wildlife response unit and 'well-capping technology' that must necessarily be sited overseas. Each of his points are highly contestable and I'm compiling a response that addresses those but most striking to the casual reader would be a counter to Mr Pfahlert's analogy of the air crash. He says,

"By way of analogy, we don't design planes to protect passengers when they crash, They are designed for the purpose of flying, yet people who fly understand that the consequences of an air crash are often fatal. "

Goodness! There's so much to play with there! I'm thinking immediately of those who choose not to fly and wondering about Southlanders who choose not to have oil rigs off shore of their beaches. Mr Pfahlert's analogy doesn't work so well there! There's the whole insurance issue as well. Airlines, you'd imagine, compensate the families of those killed in air-crashes? Will the oil industry cover all the damage that results from a spill? Car manufacturers provide an analogy too, with their designed-for-a-crash vehicles, shock-absorbing chassis, air-bags, side-strengthening etc. And of course, travellers can go by bicycle or even, perish the thought, walk.
I think Mr Pfahlert chose a poor analogy in his falling-from-the-sky passenger jet.
Still, I mustn't be churlish. I was very gracious of Mr Pfahlert to respond to my questioning so comprehensively.
I expect he'll get some response via the 'letters' column.
Perhaps you, gentle reader, might be moved to put pen to paper.
Later today, I'll transcribe the article here, or perhaps lift Kylie's scanned copy. Sadly, the Southland Times doesn't put it's Opinion pieces on line any more.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Oil film













I'm interviewing again today, this time the topic is 'Drilling the Great South Basin'.
Seems no one else is willing to speak out against describe potential drawbacks to the proposals to establish an off-shore oil rig or two in the tumultuous seas south off Stewart Island.
I'm not so shy.
Exxon Mobil have upped-stumps and left the scene and that's a significant setback to the everyones's plans to free that Texas Tea.
There are millions if titi that won't be shedding a tear over that.

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Weakening our oil drilling rules?













About the same as allowing someone with 200 hours in a Cessna to drive a jumbo jet.

KJT blogging here finds moves by Maritime NZ to relax the requirements around some aspects that effect the safety of off-shore drilling for oil worrying.

"Maritime NZ have a road show going around the country with a proposal to make things cheaper for the offshore oil drilling industry.
Current requirements for STCW/SOLAS certification for crews and the vessel on oil rig tenders may be relaxed to allow inshore qualifications up to the new within 200 miles of the coast “Near sheltered waters limit”.
I.E. Off the East Coast or in the Great South Basin."

That's in our patch and KJT's warning should be of great interest to us.